COMMISSION ON THE POWERS AND ELECTORAL
ARRANGEMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
of the
EVIDENCE OF:
Police Authorities of Wales
held at
The Civic Centre, Merthyr County Borough
Council
on
THURSDAY 26th JUNE 2003
|
| |
In Attendance
|
|
Councillor Haydn Lewis, Chair of Dyfed-Powys
Police Authority
Councillor Ray Thomas, Chair of South
Wales Policy Authority and Chair of the Police Authorities
of Wales
Viv Waters MBE, J.P., Chair of Gwent
Police Authority
Lyn James, Deputy Chief Executive of
Unitary Authority, Treasurer of South Wales Police Authority
and National Advisor to the Police Authorities of Wales
Kelvin Dent, Clerk to North Wales Police
Authorities, Legal Advisor to the Police Authorities
of Wales
Daisy Seabourne, Policy Officer to PAW
Lord Richard, Richard Commission
Ted Rowlands, Richard Commission
Tom Jones, Richard Commission
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth, Richard Commission
Paul Valerio, Richard Commission
Dr Laura McAllister, Richard Commission
Peter Price, Richard Commission
Vivienne Sugar, Richard Commission
|
|
Proceedings
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
What we have asked all the witnesses
to do is to identify themselves for the sake of the
transcript so people know who it is here in future,
and secondly to open up the subject for us for about
5 or 10 minutes to make the points you would like to
make.
|
|
We have all read the paper. Then we can
pursue those issues which the Commission might find
it useful to take up with you, either individually or
collectively, or however you like to arrange it, if
that is all right.
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
Could I kick off then? Ray Thomas, Chair
of South Wales Policy Authority and Chair of the Police
Authorities of Wales at the present moment.
|
|
We certainly welcome the opportunity
of presenting our evidence to the Commission on behalf
of the Police Authority of Wales. I think my colleagues
would like to introduce themselves and I can lead on
afterwards.
|
|
Hadyn Lewis
|
|
Haydn Lewis, Chair of Dyfed-Powys Police
Authority.
|
|
Viv Waters
|
|
Viv Waters, Chair of Gwent Police Authority.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
Deputy Chief Executive of Unitary Authority
but I am also Treasurer of South Wales Police Authority
and National Advisor to the Police Authorities of Wales.
|
|
Kelvin Dent
|
|
Bore da, Clerk to North Wales
Police Authorities and I am also legal advisor to the
Police Authorities of Wales.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Could I ask you all to speak up. The
acoustics in this room are not very good and I think,
both for the sake of the record and for the more elderly
members, it would be helpful.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
For the sake of the Chair too. Shout
at us if you will.
|
|
Daisy Seabourne
|
|
Daisy Seabourne, the Policy Officer to
PAW.
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
Thank you for giving us this opportunity.
As is presented in our paper, we are very cautious in
relation to the devolution of police within Wales. There
is an element of saying, yes, we want to go ahead, and
there are certain issues that we would rather take some
time over. There are certain issues that we would want
to reflect upon. Certainly we have got an excellent
relationship, as a Police Authority of Wales, with the
National Assembly at the present moment. We have secured
a good relationship with the previous Minister of Finance,
who has the portfolio in relation to policing matters
within Wales, and we are delighted we have retained
that Minister and the new portfolio heading of Social
Justice within Wales and policing matters as well. We
certainly think that we have got a very good relationship
and we have access to Ministers within Wales on policing
issues. As I have said, the paper that we presented
to you is a full and fact paper and we certainly have
concerns There are many unresolved issues we would like
to look at in the forthcoming time period, but overall
we are cautious, but I think that, speaking on behalf
of my colleagues, we do see that it is inevitable we
will have further links with the Assembly. Having said
that, I think it is a matter for your committee to question
us maybe on some of the issues that we have got within
our paper.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Do any of your colleagues want to comment
at the outset? No?
|
|
Can we start by looking at page 4 of
your papers, the third paragraph from the bottom: "The
Police Authorities in Wales broadly agree in principle
that if the powers of the National Assembly for Wales
were increased to include policing then there would
be advantages for policing in Wales". That's a bit higher
than cautious.
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
There are advantages. As I have explained
in the introduction, we are seeing benefits where we
can arrange meetings with the Minister concerned, but
we are concerned about the funding issues. In relation
to the differences between the Home Office and the National
Assembly and I think that some of the issues of precepts
and problems, of precepting issues within Wales and
England, are totally different and some of these issues
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Before we come on to the problems, can
I ask you about the advantages. What advantages would
you see? You say there would be advantages for policing
in Wales.
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
I think the partnership working in Wales
that we have got across the Government in Wales and
the voluntary sector, I think these are some of the
issues we could work in partnership with the National
Assembly, tTarian where we identified drug and misuse
problems within the whole of Wales and the Assembly
responded very quickly in making funding available.
I think that one of the major issues is the closeness
of us working in partnership across Wales with forces,
in partnership with the Assembly and with Local Government.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Let us move on to the problems. The big
problem is the funding problem. Can you explain that
to us?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
The differences in funding where we can
see major issues coming from the Home Office. We get
the funding via the Home Office and then it is topped
up within the Assembly. As I mentioned, there is an
urgency of that issue is in relationship to the precepts.
The council tax issues are a major issue here in Wales,
where it does not seem to be as important an issue in
England. The Assembly is continuously watching the four
Police Authorities in Wales in relation to funding and
particularly raising funding via the Council tax. I
do not know if any of my colleagues would like to say
anything.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
Shall I come in on the funding issue?
As you know there are three main elements to police
funding. One is police grant, one is the revenue support,
and the third one is the Council taxpayer. This is an
over simplification, but basically we can deal with
those three. As far as the grant is concerned that comes
from the Home Office, but the revenue support comes
from the National Assembly of Wales. They have an influencing
factor in terms of the ultimate level of the Council
tax. That I think is one of the important things. There
are other issues I can go onto, but certainly in the
last couple of years there has been a tendency for more
police expenditure and more of the burden to be paid
for by the Council taxpayer. There has been a move from
grant and revenue support to the council taxpayer. This
is a clear policy intention in England as far as English
government is concerned, but I have to say from a Welsh
Assembly point of view and they can speak for
themselves on this they do not find this solution
to be satisfactory in the Welsh context. You have an
English movement positively pushing more onto the council
taxpayer but there is quite a resistance at Assembly
and local level to that happening in Wales. There is
a good example of having a policy, which is okay for
one but not for the other. Now, a further thing that
worries me -
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
The English do not like their Council
tax.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
I am not saying they do, but this is
a trend the English government has built into its settlements.
If you follow it through to the Welsh settlement, then
the Assembly members have shown that they are not happy
with increasing the council tax.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Let us take this is in stages if we may.
It seems to me, if the Assembly takes greater responsibility
for funding of police, but you as police organisation
you have to compete with other rather important issues
that the Assembly also wants to spend money on, education
and health, do you think you will get more out of it
that way?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
This is why we are cautious about the
funding issue. We need tounderstand more about total
police funding, more than we do. I am giving an example
of the way in which increasing council tax would be
unacceptable in the Welsh context.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
If you got more money out of it, you
would be in favour of the Assembly having greater powers.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
I think we just want to make sure Wales
has its fair share. That really is what it is all about.
We believe Wales is not on a par with England.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Really it is a question of saying you
want the existing levels of funding safeguarded and,
if possible, increased, but you think the powers should
come down to the Assembly.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
There are issues within the present grant
arrangements which do not favour Wales. All I can say
is what I see. As far as the current settlement is concerned,
there is a top slicing from the national settlement,
for the Metropolitan Police, which is money clearly
Wales does not share in. There are area cost adjustments
because of funding expenditure pressures around the
Home Counties and around south-east England and moving
gradually into the Midlands as well, and Wales does
not get any benefit from that. There are also issues
about the way in which the rural grant and the industrial
pressures are recognised within the overall settlement.
I am just making the general point that of late there
have been issues which have not favoured Wales because
money from a combined settlement has been top sliced.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
What sort of money are we talking about?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
The Metropolitan slice would be about
200 million out of I have not got the figures
here.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Approximately.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
Probably about 7 billion, something like
that.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
What kinds of police expenditure come
from the Home Office grant, what comes from the Assembly
revenue support, and what is then translated into Council
tax? Can you give us some examples of the different
funding streams and what they pay for?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
The Home Office grant and revenue support
grant are grants that are paid in supporting the general
expenditure of the police, so they cover the operational
side, the police on the beat, the support staff, equipment,
buildings, all various things like that.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
What percentage of your expenditure would
that be directly from the Home Office?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
Just over 50 per cent, because 50% for
expenditure at standard spending assessment
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
The Assembly funding?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
That would be approximately it
will change per Authority but as a general rule
it would be about 38/39 per cent. Council tax will probably
contribute about 13 per cent.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
The controversial bit is a small part.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
The controversial part is growing, This
is made worse by virtue of the gearing effect in Wales
and the Welsh tax base is lower than the English tax
base and therefore additional expenditure on the lower
tax base causes more than a proportionate increase in
council tax.
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
Would the situation on ground level not
be just the same? You have the massive population base
in Glamorgan. Would you not find the forces in North
and West Wales would find that their share of the fund
would be moved elsewhere because of their greater demands?
Also we had evidence given at a recent seminar we attended
in which a senior police officer was saying, when there
are special initiatives announced by the Home Office,
that very often in Wales rural areas they do not benefit
from this. Again, if that funding en bloc was transferred
to Wales, you would be rather cut off again from those
initiatives.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
It depends on the arrangements by which
the rural funding comes through.
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
How would you like to see that?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
I think I want you to accept it is very
difficult for us at the moment, even in our position
, to understand all the money that is available in England
compared to Wales. We have asked these questions of
the Assembly. There is a working group where we are
trying to identify this , but a lot of initiatives in
England are called by different terms, different names,
so there are complications in following these things
through. It is not easy for us to look at the position,
but all I am saying is I think, if there was a transfer
of policing powers and police money, then I think we
would have to look very, very carefully and cautiously
at what method was used to transfer that money. Wales
would prefer the special initiatives all wrapped up
in one block. That would be something that would ease
the situation and guarantee us a share of the English
position, but I would want to start from the position
of knowing what do the English forces get and to compare
that then with what is available in Wales, because there
is some evidence that money is available, particularly
on the Local Government side, in England which is not
available for Police Authorities . All we are saying
is can we can start with a blank piece of paper and
reconcile funding available in English forces compared
with funding available to Welsh Forces
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can you give us some practical examples
about the disadvantages?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
I can probably give you one or two. For
instance in England street crime initiative there was
25 million of additional funding made available to support
police operations against street crime and targeted
in 10 street crime forces. They are all English, South
Yorkshire, Thames Valley, forces like that.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
The case in Wales is that street crime
should not be one of your top performance indicators
because you did not see it as a big issue.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
I do not know what priority the English
forces put on it but the money is available, 25 million
over and above the settlement.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
There was big row when the Home Office
decided street robbery was the number 1 issue and the
Chief Constable of Wales and the Assembly said, "Hang
on, no, we shouldn't have that as one of our targets,
because it is not a big issue"?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
I am talking about the money. I would
like to know what happened to the equivalent money in
Wales. Wales is subject to the Barnett format. I am
trying to be perfectly honest and open and say I do
not know. It has never been reconciled and explained
to me. When an initiative is funded in England, how
is money handed out in Wales for a similar purpose.
I just do not know. I ask the question honestly to find
out.
|
|
Peter Price
|
|
You made a case about the linkage between
your basic position outwith devolution of police powers
and the financial side, because your position seems
to be, if you are at least not disadvantaged on the
financial side, in principle you would be in favour
of devolving the function. The way that this sort of
negotiation would normally work is that you take what
percentage of the total take is currently being spent
in Wales, that percentage would then be added to the
Barnett formula, and that means that you can take in
the overall as it is at the moment. That would be the
starting point for any negotiations. It may be in such
detailed negotiations that arguments could be put about
the fairness of the percentage currently obtained and
maybe some adjustment of a fairly marginal character
might be achieved. You are not likely to get into those
negotiations unless there is pretty much a decision
of principle in the first place. In other words you
cannot achieve a change in the kind of way that ideally
you would like. Tell us the colour of your money first
and then we will decide whether we want it. I think
you need to have a decision of principle, but with the
knowledge that you are unlikely globally to do worse
than the current percentage, because that is the nature
of the formula. Would you, as it were, buy that, that
that is the likely sort of outcome there or thereabouts
on the financial side? Would that cause you to say okay,
in principle we are in favour?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
My answer to that would be yes, providing
there was some sort of understanding. I agree I am not
really here saying, "I want a piece of that, I want
a piece of that". All I want is a fair settlement for
Wales. In moving forward independently you want to be
assured you start from the right place and move forward
from there. That really is the only point I am making
and required an audit of where we are at the moment
I accept there are going to be pluses and minuses over
a period of time. I accept that completely. But I would
want to be assured that the sum of money that is available
and which we are going to work on is fair and we can
move forward on that basis. Fair maybe a difficult word
in that sense, but I think we have to assure ourselves
that in moving forward we are moving forward from a
sound base.
|
|
Peter Price
|
|
If I may press you once further. You
are where you are. You have described that basis as
unfair, by implying it is unfair at the moment, by the
way you wish it to be. Whatever percentage is there
at the moment overall is likely to be the starting point
in any negotiations. The only advantage on the financial
side you are likely to accrue is there would be some
detailed negotiations and, if you put together some
very, very compelling statistics, maybe in such negotiations
you could achieve some advantage, but you would be starting
from where things are at the moment. That is the point.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
Yes. I understand the question and the
way you are putting it to me. If I look at where we
are at the moment, then as part of this year's settlement,
there was clearly some sort of misunderstanding between
the Welsh Assembly Government and the Home Office over
a level of top slice. The end result of that was that
Forces in Wales actually lost more money. The Welsh
Assembly Package contained a sum of money, we assumed,
that was coming through in the settlement because the
Home Office top slice was greater than expected, all
four forces received less money that anticipated. Forces
in Wales fell below. Are you aware of floors and ceilings?
You cannot increase above a certain figure and you cannot
go below. Two Forces in Wales now are below the floor
and are being supported by additional Home Office money
that had to be given at the last moment. That to me
is not a satisfactory position for moving forward in
terms of devolving powers.. If we can resolve certain
things like that, then I accept the point you are making.
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
Are there regional areas of England that
could argue similar cases?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
They would be subject to the 2% and 4%
floor and ceiling in a similar way. .
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
How do the Scottish forces cope?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
We understand they were.
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
I hope I do not do a disservice to the
argument. We want to be independent. Get some more money.
Yes, in a sense the Assembly is a new player in this,
in terms of the relationships it has to establish with
the Home Office in terms of your finance. But is there
not an argument, when you are talking about how the
Metropolitan commands, urban commands benefit, of being
part of the wider rural constabulary, that would include
Devon and Cornwall, Cumbria and so on, all equally arguing
the issues about rurality with the Home Office and getting
the Assembly element of that transfer right. That would
in a sense help solve the financial position. What I
do not actually hear, what I do not see coming out very
clearly in this, is what is the operational gain of
moving the Police Authorities as a devolved function.
What would the people of Wales gain by that, leaving
the finance aside?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
I think I mentioned earlier the operational
gain would be the close working links we have already
established and the partnership working we could establish
with the Assembly and through Local Government within
Wales. That, I think, is the big issue in relation to
us, that we are working with partnerships, particularly
with the CDRPs that have been set up throughout Wales.
That is one of the big issues for us is to work in partnership
with our partners within Wales. We have got evidence
that these partnerships are working at the present moment,
but certainly we have got issues then in relation to
cross border issues with England, as we have set out
in our submission, that crime does not stop at the borders.
Those are some of the issues we are concerned about
our working relationship with forces across the border.
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
In a sense you have got that partnership
now. You are saying it is working well, so what is the
gain? PCA's set up recognise the fact that Merseyside
crime will flow into North Wales. Avon crime will flow
into South Wales. Is there not more of a problem that
comes from devolving the police authorities?
|
|
Kelvin Dent
|
|
Can I pick on something you mentioned
earlier, this very important and helpful answer, when
you refer to the street crime initiative, which we in
Wales did not think was particularly relevant to the
Welsh situation. At the moment the priorities are set
by the Home Office and they would reflect the British
priorities, targets would reflect the British priority
and the targets would reflect the British aspirations,
and we do feel sometimes there's a lack perhaps of local
Welsh feeling within the priorities and an opportunity
perhaps missed to effect what the local priorities should
be with the policing plan and through the local policing
plans.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
It would be possible to have some regional
variation if the negotiation between Welsh Assembly
Government and the Home Office was robust enough to
take account of those issues. You do not necessarily
have to have it devolved, or do you? One of the examples
I have heard from someone else is the effectiveness
of emergency planning, that it is overly complex because
of split responsibilities. What are your views on that
as an advantage?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
There are issues within Wales that are
totally different than in England. The talks we have
had with Assembly officials are that, whether or not
we could have a trial basis, have a procurement basis
where we could have 3 years out to set our own targets
and see what is and what would be good for Wales in
difference to England. Maybe that would be some way
down the line where we could get the 3 year period,
a trial period outside of England, where we could set
our own targets, because, as Kelvin has made the point,
in relation to national targets, the robbery rate issue
on national basis does not affect Dyfed, Powys, where
they know and I think some of these national targets
are not running in line with some of our problems that
we have in Wales.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
If you were talking about transfers in
some of the policing powers, can we identify which those
should be? In appendix A to your document it very helpfully
lists every power that is around in the 1996 Act and
so forth. If one was looking at prime candidates for
transfer, because you have said in principle you are
not against the transfer, would the second dot after
the initiative to publish a plan, would that be a prime
matter for transfer that would become an Assembly responsibility?
The Police Authorities would they go that far? You have
been complaining about the annual policing plan of the
Home Office does not affect the various factors. Would
that be the prime candidate?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
It would go a long way because we have
got to draw up our annual policing plan in accordance
with national targets, and I think that would go a long
way in identifying our own targets.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Become responsible for establishing a
Welsh Assembly Government and an annual Policing Plan
for Wales. What about to appointing and dismissing Chief
Constables? Would that be a candidate for transfer of
power? In other words the responsibility for dismissing
Chief Constables would be transferred from the Secretary
of State, Home Office, to the National Assembly Minister
for Justice.
|
|
Kelvin Dent
|
|
The appointment is with the Police Authority
but it has to be with the Secretary of State's consent.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Does the Policing Authority support that
in principle?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
I certainly cannot speak on behalf of
the other Police Authorities on that issue.
|
|
Viv Waters
|
|
With regard to the global question
and I will indicate part of the answer with Mr Thomas
with regard to partnership working, if it is
already working, what benefit could one get, because
if it is working at maximum now? What I would say on
behalf of that, yes, the partnership scheme is working
and the difficult problems that we are coming up against
at the moment and it has already surfaced in
what Lyn has said with regard to the Council tax, and
although it is only a small part, and he has mentioned
this figure of round about 10 per cent, but if what
we are getting at the moment from the centre has been
slightly reduced, the only methods we have got of putting
that up is by the council tax. We are getting and will
be getting into greater difficulties, and a typical
example is, as far as Gwent is concerned, it went up
to 3.8% last year, to 21.5% this year, and projected
figures are showing in could increase dramatically the
following year and it is causing tremendous difficulties.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
The Commission is charged with the task
of advising whether or not certain powers should be
transferred to the National Assembly. You have said
in principle, subject to all the other problems you
have identified, you are not in principle against the
transfer of powers. I would like you to say, if you
could, as we ticked off those in appendix A, which are
your prime targets for transfer and we can discuss whether
we are convinced by that argument. Could you advise
me briefly on which ones?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
On the point of dismissal in a personnell
situation I would not see any difference in the Assembly
having that power rather than Westminster, but my only
problem is that, when you talk about national negotiations
etc. as far as Chief Constables are concerned, the recruitment,
and there is talk of within the national setting is
that they are looking outside of even England for good
chief officers etc., and whether that would be detrimental
to the recruitment of officers within Wales, because
there is a perception out there, and indeed we are going
through a process at the moment in South Wales of recruitment,
where we have had only 4 applications for a Chief Constable
and that is disappointing. First-class applications
by the way, but it is disappointing only 4.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
The proportion of staff in training schools.
There is one off on the next to comply on performance
targets for ministerial priorities. What about section
38? How would you mark that? What we would like to know
is can you identify you have given us a very
helpful list of powers and identified them we
would love to know how far the Police Authority would
like to go in devolving. We can identify the power and
say yes to that and perhaps no to that.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
It would perhaps be helpful if you wrote
afterwards on this point, because it is rather a difficult
question.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
The obligation to the Police Authorities
are open to the Home Office. How would you feel if those
powers stopped, not to the Home Office but down to the
Assembly?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
We will write back to you when the Authorities
have met again.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
I wanted to ask about the issue of monitoring
and evaluation and performance measurement and so on;
should the police become a devolved area? I just wonder
whether you have given any thought as to how that might
function. Would you expect to have complete responsibility
for the performance measurement side, should the policing
function be devolved, and if so how would you ensure
that four very different forces, as you have explained
to us, would be effectively measured? Would you be using
the same kind of standards that are currently in place
through the Police Standard Unit, I think you refer
to in the paper, or would you look at something quite
different? There is a lot of literature on how to decentralise
performance measure and how an all-Wales situation might
take on very different values and different measures
to what is happening at the moment.
|
|
Viv Waters
|
|
I think that can be answered quite concisely.
The system in place, there is a reporting procedure
for the Standards Unit. There is also a recording covering
it for all the men in at any other time they need and
there's a reporting procedure for that. HMIC come in
at regular intervals, but they can also be called in
by the Police Authority for any particular area we might
deem to want an in-depth report. I think the same system
is there. That system will carry on and it will be a
matter of reporting procedure. They report to the Assembly
as well. The reports of these independent bodies are
available.
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
This is just to clarify. You would still
like to see the discipline standards, the performance
standards, as being set by HMIC. Scotland has its own
inspectorate. You would still want those requirements
to be set by the HMIC for England and Wales?
|
|
Viv Waters
|
|
There is already a professional standard
being adhered to. The HMIC have the professionalism
to come in and advise us on any areas. We cannot carry
on ourselves and we would need that expertise. If that
system remained there, there would be no difficulty
in us, nor the Assembly, nor anyone that is deemed to
be needing a report like that to have a report.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
From my point of view each of the Welsh
forces is different. From a South Wales point of view,
with all due respect to colleagues, there is not much
point South Wales comparing itself with other Welsh
forces when the whole make up and the balance and the
geography are different. I think we would have to retain
national comparisons and national performance measures
and national performance standards. Our family 8 forces
contain goodness knows how many English ones we compare
ourselves with in a real way with what we do and they
do.
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
About comparisons in terms of performance
measurement, you could have quite different targets
as you do from one area to another.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
The English Best Value is very different
from some aspects of the Welsh approach. Would you envisage
revisiting a lot of those particular measurements should
policing be devolved?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
A fine example is Best Value where we
follow the English pattern of Best Value where the Local
Government have the Wales Improvement Programme. We
feel that the Wales Improvement Programme is a far better
way.. Issues like that definitely have crossed our minds
and we would rather go down the route of the Wales Improvement
Programme.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
When you come to tick off the list of
duties the current Authorities have and the transfer,
could you look in particular at the complaints procedures,
2, because, as I understand it, there is a new independent
police complaints being established under England and
Wales. To what extent have the Wales Authorities been
consulted? Will it have a Wales regional set up or any
linkages to Authorities in Wales or to the National
Assembly? Have you been involved in any discussions
on that?
|
|
Kelvin Dent I am aware of the new body.
I am not aware specifically of discussions or consultation,
or even the need to ensure Welsh representation on that,
but certainly when we draft our further representations
we will look into this.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I raise an entirely different point?
Page 4 of your statement, fourth paragraph, lack of
understanding in Whitehall. It is lack of understanding
by Welsh Assembly Government officials regarding the
system of police funding in central government. What
is the problem there?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
The best illustration is going back to
2001/2 where the four Welsh Police Authorities were
"accused" is the best word of overspending
in relation to English colleagues and English comparisons.
We did an analysis, and what we found was that part
of the issue arise from a lack of understanding by Welsh
Assembly officials. As a result of information that
was then shared between finance officers on both sides.
The issue was resolved succesfully and that was the
end of it. But there was a moment where Mrs Hart was
obliged to consider capping the Welsh police forces
and we provided various information and we increased
the level of understanding and we continue to do that
now by meeting together as Treasurers on the one side
and Finance Officials on the other, and I have to say
the relationship now has gone to one of being extremely
helpful and productive.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
You used the present tense, "There is
a lack of understanding", but it is "was", is it?
|
|
Lyn Thomas
|
|
I think it is more a 'was', yes, than
an 'is'. We do work extremely well together and I have
to say, when some of the issues were pointed at to Mrs
Hart this year about the level of council tax, she provided
another 2 million pounds of funding to reduce the Council
tax bill for the current year. I think that is an example
of a problem being presented and part of a solution
being offered.
|
|
Hadyn Lewis
|
|
When we had some trouble in the schools,
Mrs Hart gave us police people in schools to cure the
problem before it ever occurs. That is something that
has never been tried before.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can we be clear about the message that
you are, combined, giving to us. What do you see as
the down side of transfer to the Assembly, apart from
the funding aspect?
|
|
Kelvin Dent
|
|
Can I start by saying in response to
earlier question, yes we would be in principle, in North
Wales at least, in favour of transferring certain functions
of the Secretary of State to the Assembly, for example
the power to approve the appointment or dismissal of
Chief Constables. We would want to be satisfied that
the resources were there.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
I take the resources point. That is the
down side point that you want to make. It is a resources
point?
|
|
Kelvin Dent
|
|
That is onepoint yes.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
What others are there?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
Some of the linkages we have got nationally
in relation to national issues of Airwave, and human
resources issues, and so forth, some of those issues
may be of concern to us. Airwave, where we have to have
some procurement with the National Force in relation
to ENAS of NCS etc. and that work in relation to those
Assembly issues that would need a lot of resolving.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Why would it be different if it came
down to the Assembly?
|
|
Daisy Seaborne
|
|
New relationships would have to be formed
if powers were transferred to the Assembly with the
Home Office and certain central organisations i PAW
would be concerned there would be another new relationship
formed and would be keen to make sure that national
perspectives are still taken.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
The first organisation we have heard
of the Commission which is in favour of retaining their
relationship with [inaudible].
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Reflecting on evidence given to us about
two months ago on advantages of transfer and it being
suggested to us that there could be savings if powers
were transferred, because you could build a greater
operational arrangement with other emergency services,
there might be scope for rationalisation with a number
of police Forces in Wales, and I was intrigued to see
the resolution of North Wales Police Authority that
your support for devolving powers is subject to maintaining
separate police forces. Do you see any advantages if
the Assembly were able to orchestrate greater co-operation
with fire and ambulance and other emergency services?
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
There are some issues there where we
do co-operate across borders now, particularly on training
issues etc., but there would be issues where we could
maybe set up national training centres etc. rather than
have 4 training centres across the area, but we have
got national bases now, but there are issues across
training issues, and so forth, that there could be collaboration
between the four forces.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
I think it is going back to evidence
we had some time ago. The suggestion was made that you
would have the police station in Aberystwyth combined
with the fire station and perhaps the ambulance station,
and that was really the suggestion and you would have
economies through doing this, and that it was suggested
that it would be nice if Wales could make such experiments,
if they were so minded to do. It was not what you were
saying.
|
|
Ray Thomas
|
|
We have not had talks with our counterparts
in the fire service or ambulance service, as the Police
Authorities of Wales. But we understand what you are
saying, and I think most of us realise there is a possibility
of joint working in that relationship, and particularly
joint working call centres. It has proved difficult
in some other powers that have tried it out already.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
The possible bureaucracy that may or
may not flow from such changes. At this moment of time
someone in the Home Office and separate agencies in
Whitehall there are X number of servants spending their
time, as it were, administering the Welsh provision.
We have no idea of current cost of staffing. It was
implied to us when we met Chief Constables, it was meaningless
or minor. Would there be a multiple cost in the bureaucracy
if the kind of transfers of functions we are talking
about happened? Anyone any idea?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
I do not know the costs, but I would
say that is likely and you would have to create to some
extent I do not know to what extent an
administration in Cardiff to support the facilities
and powers ofwhatever you were transferring over. I
think that is recognised.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Lost in the Home Office budget and not
in any way attributed to Wales.
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
They would be netted off against revenues
available. I think it would be incorrect to assume we
can do this for no cost. There is bound to be some sort
of administrative support needed to support the Assembly,
if powers were transfered.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
You have no idea of the order of what
that would be?
|
|
Hadyn Lewis
|
|
We are building [inaudible] a joint call
centre. We will be working with the Fire Brigade as
well in Carmarthen.
|
|
Viv Waters
|
|
There has been a pilot of that done in
Gloucestershire and we have been closely monitoring
what is going on there. They have a central control
system and it is a 3-storey building they have, the
fire service, the ambulance service and the police,
and this new headquarters will be going on the same
site and we are closely monitoring things like that
and getting feed back, and it could very will be a way
forward in the not too distant future.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Can I go back a long way to Mr James'
very interesting replies about funding. It has been
put to us by powerful evidence that you do not want
to open up Barnett, that Wales is doing very well from
Barnett. You are really saying you want to open up the
books and what some previous evidence has said very
strongly, indeed from people who ought to know, is do
not rock the boat. Barnett does Wales fine. Have you
thought about that in suggesting this opening up?
|
|
Lyn James
|
|
It is not up to someone in my position
to suggest opening up the Barnett formula. What I am
saying, however, is what I want is a better sense of
transparency and accountability about those funds that
flow to Wales. When there is a statement on the English
side saying 10 million pounds has been made available
to this, all I am saying is can I see an audited statement
that shows a proportion of those funds coming into Wales.
If Wales chooses to use those funds, or not, on other
purposes, and if it can do so, fine. If Wales says it
does not want them, fine. I am just asking the very
simple question, if there is 25 million extra along
side and I am expecting 17.5% of the total, can I please
see it on the other. It is as simple as that. The Barnett
formula is too big for my mind.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
I put my question badly. It was also
on the additional money and it has also been suggested
to us it has not always been shared out as it should
have been. On higher education, the new White Paper,
that there was no apparent consultation with the Welsh.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I thank you all for coming and delivering
a message that was clear and unmistakable. Thank you
very much indeed. It was very helpful.
|
|
|