MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
|
of the
|
EVIDENCE OF:
|
Sports Council For Wales
|
held at
|
The Civic Centre, Merthyr County Borough
Council
|
on
|
FRIDAY 27TH JUNE 2003
|
|
In Attendance:
|
Gareth Davies, Chairman, Sports
Council for Wales
|
Huw Jones, Chief Executive, Sports
Council for Wales
|
Lord Richard, Richard Commission
|
Ted Rowlands, Richard Commission
|
Peter Price, Richard Commission
|
Vivienne Sugar, Richard Commission
|
Dr Laura McAllister, Richard Commission
|
Tom Jones, Richard Commission
|
Huw Vaughan Thomas, Richard Commission
|
Paul Valerio, Richard Commission
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth, Richard
Commission
|
Proceedings
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Thank you very much for coming. I'm very
grateful to you for taking the time to come and talk
to us. I wonder if you'd do two things for us. One is
identify yourself for the purposes of the transcript;
secondly perhaps open up the subject for 5 or 10 minutes
or so and then we can pursue issues which we think we'd
like to pursue.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
My name is Gareth Davies. I'm Chairman
of the Sports Council of Wales.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
I'm Huw Jones, Chief Executive of the
Sports Council for Wales.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
I'll do the opening up bit, shall I,
just in response? First of all, thank you for asking
us to contribute towards the Commission's work on the
powers of the National Assembly. By way of introduction,
I'm sure colleagues round the table will perhaps know
to varying degrees of the work of the Council, but I
thought if I gave you a quick backdrop into the history
of the Council so far and its current workings. The
Sports Council was formed just over 30 years ago by
Royal Charter with the primary objectives and responsibilities
of increasing sports participation for, obviously,
a number of reasons and, secondly, to raise standards
of performance within and across a number of sports.
Since then, I think those priorities obviously still
stand true, although others have come to the fore as
well, namely assisting the provision of sporting facilities
throughout Wales and, more in the last decade, in providing
support services aligned to the excellence and raising
standards end - the second branch I mentioned, which
is providing medical, scientific and nutritional support
services for our more elite athletes.
|
|
In terms of The Sports Council's funding,
we get direct grant aid from the National Assembly.
The Chairman (myself) is appointed by the Minister,
and obviously I'm accountable to him or her for the
work of the Council and its achievements. Currently
from direct aid grant from the Assembly we've received
just over 10 million pounds annually. The strategy of
the Council this strategy is the latest, which
was laid out in 1999 entitled "Young People First" with
the emphasis on encouraging as many young people as
possible to take up sports at various levels because
the research proved that if younger people could embrace
or get involved in sport, those skills necessary to
take part will be with them forever. It's far easier
to try and hone your skills at a younger age as opposed
to later on in life.
|
|
The Council is an independent body, but
I think we are mindful of the political agenda. I think
people perhaps see the Council all too often as only
interested in looking after the elite end of sport.
That's really a very small part of our function. I think
the areas that certainly in my time in the Council we've
been involved in has been the cross-cutting areas and
aligned to the political agendas, such as social inclusion,
ensuring areas of deprivation are afforded equal opportunities
in terms of being able to take part in sport, which
perhaps hasn't been the case because of the deprivation
evident in those areas.
|
|
If I go back to funding, we're also funded
from the National Lottery. We're a distributor. We receive
currently just over £10 million. That's a diminishing
pot. The fund is down from £15 million. For total funding
we're running over the £20 million mark. So, we are
conscious of the cross-cutting areas, which aligns itself
to the political agenda: social inclusion, I mentioned;
health is another area where sport undoubtedly has a
role to play. That's an area that is being increasingly
acknowledged by the National Assembly.
|
|
Over the last 2 years or so, we led an
action group looking into health and active lifestyles,
which has reported to both the Culture Minister and
the Health Minister during the last 12 months. Education
is another area we've been very concerned as to the
level of PE being taught in schools, and we've been
concerned about the level of training given to teachers
in order to carry out PE in schools and, again, we've
led a taskforce on looking at education in schools and
recently been granted a significant amount of money
from the Education Minister in pushing forward education
at primary school level. Therefore, I think we do cross-cut
into most aspects of our
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Should we add the £5 million to this
budget?
|
|
Gareth Rowlands
|
|
Yes, which I think is for a 3-year period.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Yes.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
Yes. We do also have a role to play,
I think, outside sport per se. People often see The
Sports Council or a perception of The Sports
Council as at the top end of performance level.
Undoubtedly that's the area that seems to grab most
of the attention, but, as I said earlier on, that really
is a very small part of our operation. That's an opening
gambit.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Thank you. Can I ask about your relations
with the Assembly? How are they?
|
|
Gareth Richards
|
|
They have been better. It's interesting
in terms of I mentioned the fact that we're an independent
body, but cognisant of the fact that we do and want
to work alongside the political agenda. I think we used
the term with the previous Minister recently that we
are an arms length body, although those arms are getting
shorter and we are aware of that as well and it's a
challenge for us to manage in terms of having done something
yes, fairly distant arms length in our previous
existence with the Welsh Office. I think the number
of people we were in contact with were very few and
far between.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Do you go to any Assembly Committees?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
Yes, we're on the agenda fairly regularly.
I think two or three times annually we present, at various
stages, a corporate plan to the Culture Committee.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
It's interesting that the other day,
in terms of the cross-cutting themes, the Health and
Social Services Committee considered the report of the
Culture Committee on sports participation in Wales and
the benefits that that would provide to the health promotion
agenda. I think that is one of the significant improvements
that we've seen in recent years, how that cross-cutting
theme actually is working in practice.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Can I ask about the budget, the £10 million
that comes directly from the Assembly, is that conditional
on producing your operational plan, then a remit letter?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
Subject to a remit letter and for us
to carry out the functions.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Is that agreed with the Minister, or
Committee, or both? How does that work?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
With the Minister.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
Do you know if the Committee itself has
sight of the remit letter because some Committees seem
to and others didn't in relations with ASPB? Do you
know?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
My guess is the response would be it's
a publicly available document. There is no reason why
they shouldn't see it. I don't know if it's formally
put before them. They certainly don't discuss it, don't
consider it and don't comment on it, but whether it's
available to them it's certainly available, but
whether it's sent is another thing.
|
|
Tom Jones (In Welsh, then interpreted)
|
|
Ydy'r Cyngor Chwaraeon yn cyfarfod yn
gyhoeddus?
|
| Interpretation: |
|
Does The Sports Council meet publicly?
|
|
Huw Jones (In Welsh, then interpreted)
|
|
Ydy; fel arfer mae'n cyfarfod yn gyhoeddus
bob deufis.
|
|
Interpretation: Yes, it does;
it meets publicly every two months usually.
|
|
Tom Jones (In Welsh, then interpreted)
|
|
Allwch chi siarad am baragraff 22 a'r
cysylltiad ag Ewrop lle rydych yn nodi bod UK Sport
yn cynrychioli chwaraeon ym Mhrydain ar fforwm Ewrop?
Pa mor bwysig yw'r fforwm hwnnw? Beth all e wneud a
phwy sy'n cynrychioli UK Sport? Aelod o'r bwrdd neu
aelod o staff?
|
|
Interpretation:
|
|
Could you talk about paragraph 22
and this link with Europe where you state that UK Sport
represents British sport on the European forum? How
important is that forum? What can it do and who represents
UK Sport? Is it a board member or a staff member?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
If I could first of all, Chairman, make
a slight correction to the paper? It only came in today.
When we talk in the paper about the Assembly adopting
a more pro-active role towards sport in Europe compared
to Whitehall, actually I received a letter this morning
from the Assembly, via DCMS, which is a letter from
Tessa Jowell, the Secretary of State, to Jack Straw,
the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth
Affairs, saying that the UK policy towards Europe has
now changed as far as sport is concerned. The policy
of the UK Government was always opposed to any article
on sport within any treaty and they've now changed their
view on that formally, so they are now in favour, as
of 20 May of this year, and that is proposed to be included
in the new EU Treaty Article as a result of the European
Convention.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Do you know the terms of what they want?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
What the letter says is they are proposing
that there should be a light touch in terms of European
Union input. I think they're quite happy that there
is involvement of the European Commission in small-scale
grant aid issues, in providing advice and guidance,
but I think the Government would still be very much
opposed to the EU playing any more significant role
than that.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
I see. Can you tell us a bit about the
lottery point? You make something of it in your paper,
paragraph 12, 14, 15...
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Would you like me to answer Mr. Jones's
point first? Just to finish those off, UK Sport plays
a role which is very much focused on the excellence
end of UK sport. It is also a representative body as
far as the United Kingdom is concerned and therefore
has any seats to do with the Council of Europe as well
as the European Union. The Council of Europe obviously
doesn't have any legislative powers or anything. It's
mainly a discussion forum, promotion forum, etc. That
is actually quite useful in terms of you especially
want to learn from European issues. What can we learn
from other countries about structures, programmes, issues,
initiatives? When you're not there at that table it's
very difficult. Yes, we get minutes. Yes, we see the
odd papers and things. Like most systems that are based
on that type of structure, you invariably miss out on
those papers in minutes and certainly miss out at being
at the table and the benefit that accrues. That's the
main down-side of that particular involvement.
|
|
The world is getting a much smaller place
now. We need to learn from others and we need to learn
from not only the other home countries but from European
colleagues and things as well in terms of how sport
can be developed and how it can contribute towards social
justice, health promotion, physical education, et cetera.
In terms of the lottery, Chairman, that's a more confused
area. The powers in terms of the National Lottery are
not devolved to the Assembly and they're still retained
centrally and the Secretary of State for Culture still
has responsibility for the National Lottery, indeed,
the policies that underpin it. I think there are three
areas where that confusion reigns at the moment.
|
|
First of all, in the powers that the
Assembly does have. I believe that there is a concordat
in existence between the devolved administrations and
DCMS regarding this, but I've never actually seen this
particular concordat. That should set out what the relationship
will be between DCMS and the Assembly in relation to
things such as setting of policy directions. The legislation
allows Government to set policy directions to the distributors.
In setting those policy directions, it could say we
want you to focus on deprived communities, or we want
you to focus on young people, or want you to focus on
crime reduction, or whatever. It's not clear what input
the Assembly has into that policy direction setting.
|
|
The second issue is regarding accounting
officer issues and whose responsibility it is. The principal
accounting officer is clearly the accounting officer
for the Department of Culture Media and Sport, but,
having said that, we don't relate to DCMS financially
at all. If there were any problems that related to the
lottery, I would see my link as being the accounting
officer at the Welsh Assembly, namely the Permanent
Secretary. So, there is lack of clarity there. That
was one of those issues that was highlighted in our
recent quinquennial review.
|
|
Then, the third issue is very much related
to operations and issues relating to marketing and promotion
and those type of issues. Clearly, when you have some
bodies which are UK-based bodies and others which are
devolved, such as ourselves and the Arts Council for
Wales, then that's clearly much more difficult to do
than if you had clearly Wales-based bodies and could
discuss and negotiate with them. A lot of the Wales-based
bodies clearly have policies which are determined centrally.
So, it is a bit more challenging compared particularly
to our Exchequer one.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Is this a kind of Barnett formula for
lottery distribution? Do you get at least a prescribed
percentage of whatever, and, if so, is that favourable
or unfavourable?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
We'd always argue unfavourable. Currently,
the percentage is 4.5%.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
That is unfavourable compared to Barnett,
yes.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
It did start at 5%. I think the half-percent
we lost went into funding UK Sport, the sporting element
of UK Sport in terms of world-class performance plans.
To be fair, the Minister at the National Assembly has
always fought this tried to fight it with
DCMS in terms of a percentage because I understand the
other lottery distributors apart from ourselves and
the Arts Council because we're Welsh-based Welsh
bodies receive 6%.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Is it because they're top-slicing it
for their Centres of Excellence we're entitled
to tap? Is that the reason?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Not so much towards Centres of Excellence
but funding of elite individuals at UK level. Clearly,
some of those are Welsh and would benefit. At the moment,
it varies depending on the time of year, but it's around
about 30, something like that, plus or minus.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
30 Welsh sports people?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Right at the very top. They would benefit.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
If you totted up the cost of them, would
that pull you up to your 5% or not?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
No.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
To answer your point...
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Here we're just talking about the straightforward
lottery funding. We're not talking about millennium
money or any other things. I notice this might be shutting
the door after the horse has bolted, but do you have
a view about the distribution of all lottery funds to
Wales over the last few years, whether you feel they've
had a fair share?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
One thing the percentage of 4½% doesn't
take into account is the extra deprivation we'd argue
Wales suffers as opposed to some other areas of the
country. The other issue as well is building a swimming
pool in Wales should cost the same as building one in
England. When you've only got 10 million pounds to play
with where half of that is available as capital, it
makes the building of a swimming pool pretty difficult
because of the figures, so, again, we are at a disadvantage
because of the way the allocation is split on a percentage
basis.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
So, for big national projects: £10 million.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
Thankfully most of the major national
projects identified in the mid-90s have been met. There
is one outstanding. Then you've got your next tier of
regional centres. It's fine to have a national swimming
pool in Swansea, but North Wales requires one, South-east
Wales requires one. It makes it prohibitive to meet
those requirements.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Putting aside the lottery issue, have
your dealings with the Assembly demonstrated either
any lack of powers on their behalf or your behalf to
implement policies and the decisions that you wish to
take?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
I think at the moment that's a difficult
one to answer. There is due any week now the Assembly's
strategy on sports and physical activity. I think the
content of that will very much determine the answer
to that particular question. We haven't detected in
terms of contact with Ministers, also with the Culture
Committee, that anybody has come back and said we can't
do this. However, if we were writing a strategy, I think
that would be a different matter. I think there are
areas that need to be considered. There are areas in
the education field, areas in terms of finance, local
government, a whole host of areas whereby if there was
relaxation or changes those powers could be considered.
At the moment those issues haven't been considered,
so they're not on the political agenda.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
If you were writing a strategy, you'd
identify areas where you wouldn't have powers to do
things?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
That's right.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Be specific.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
If we looked at, for example, dual use
of school sports facilities, I think everybody would
agree in principle that's a good thing in terms of the
best use of physical assets and public provision. That
is underpinned by some quite complex legislation both
in terms of the Education No. 2 Act of 1986, Education
Reform Act of 1988...
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Education Act?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Education No 2 Act 1986, which actually
deals with the role and responsibility of school governors.
It involves the Education Reform Act 1988, which discusses
the allocation of funding between curriculum and extra-curriculum
uses. Also, the Education Act 1991, which deals with
the transfer of control arrangements between the management
of facilities between, let's say, a leisure department
and schools. So, the whole thing is quite a complex
issue for something which is relatively simple.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Don't forget the Children Act.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
And the Children Act, whatever it is
1992? So, it is fairly complex.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
This situation applies in England as
well, for dual use of English schools so...
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
The reason I cite that is, as an example,
dual use is much more prevalent in Wales and much more
of an important issue particularly in rural areas because
it would be silly to provide a leisure centre then also
try and provide school facilities on the same site.
We have lots of examples over the years where county
authorities and district authorities didn't talk to
each other and we've had duplication of facilities,
and the challenge local authorities have had over many
years is how do we rationalise that, how do we control
the funding of that? There are excellent examples around,
but also very poor examples around as well.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Did you say there was an Education Act
of 2000 that transferred a huge raft of responsibilities
in curricula and all sorts of activities to the Welsh
Assembly Government, National Assembly? Did you seek
to incorporate in that legislation the kind of alterations
to allow you to do that?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
No, we didn't. The reason was that it
wasn't on the political agenda, so the chances of that
occurring were quite small. Given the fact...
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
On the Assembly agenda?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
On the Assembly's agenda. Particularly
with the strategy being forthcoming, the Assembly needs
to take a view about those areas it wishes to address,
then seek to identify those, rather than just be opportunistic,
which we've probably been accused of.
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
I think you said there were two examples.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
A second example which comes to mind
is to do with the funding of voluntary sports clubs
and rate relief for voluntary sports clubs. There has
always been a reluctance to give mandatory 80% relief
to voluntary sports clubs, particular most local authorities,
because it's seen as a cost implication. In the early
1990s, there was an arrangement that was established
whereby local authorities could be compensated centrally
if they made that decision. But, at the moment, the
situation is it is only if you have charitable status
that you have a mandatory right to 80% rate relief.
Let's say within the sports policy it was deemed that
voluntary sports clubs played a very significant role
in health promotion, contributing to the social agendas
of communities, whatever. In my view, that can't be
done at the moment in terms of saying, therefore, if
a club can show it's contributed in that type of way
then it should receive 80% rate relief. That could be
a very important factor in terms of the promotion of
voluntary sports clubs.
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
Although that's a general point to the
UK, because of the particular strategy that the Assembly
wishes to pursue this is now a UK strategy.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
That's right.
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
Gareth, you said something very early
on to which we were sort of left hanging and I'm wondering
if you'd care to expand. I'm turning it round: you said
relations had been better with the Assembly. I just
wondered if you'd care to expand on that?
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Tell us when.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
What I then went on to explain is I think
that this arms length arrangement relationship is a
challenge for both sides. It's not a case of turning
blame on to the Assembly. It's something we have to
manage in terms of the direction. We're an Assembly
sponsored public body. I think what we require then
is the guidance, directions, scrutiny that should come
along with that. All too often, possibly, we feel that
there is a lot of work going on outside the relationship
between the Assembly and ourselves where possibly The
Sports Council is being undermined on occasions and
the sports strategy the Assembly drew up we weren't
actually consulted at all in terms of drawing up the
strategy. It just seems a little bit odd. So, I just
think there have been a few it is really some
anecdotal incidents you could relate as opposed to a
conscious swing in policy. There aren't written guidelines
as to how the relationship has changed; it's something
that's organically happened over the last 18 months.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Is there a reason, do you think?
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
What representations did you make, given
you weren't consulted? How did you handle your own complaints?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
It came to light from partners. This
was being formulated again, it does start to
undermine ourselves in terms of the way we deal with
be it governing bodies or local authorities or voluntary
clubs, et cetera.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
In terms of the structural relationships
and how these are looked at, if we go back we were established
by Royal Charter in 1972. Many of the other public bodies
in Wales weren't established by Royal Charter, apart
from ourselves, Arts Council, National Library, National
Museum of Wales. Most of the others WTB, CCW,
whatever are statutory bodies. The first question
is why were some bodies established as Royal Charter
bodies and some as statutory bodies? My view is very
much that we were established not there to discharge,
not as an agent of the Government of the day, but to
develop sport for the benefit of the people of Wales,
not the benefits of the Government of the day. Having
said that, within the Charter there is an article in
there which says the Council shall have regard to the
policies of the Government of the day. So, that is our
statutory quasi-statutory relationship with the
Assembly. By that we've interpreted it as meaning we
should follow the policies of the Government of the
day unless we've got very good reason not to follow
those policies, and, we do so, if there was a competitive
tendering issue or anything like that; policies in relation
to social deprivation, education, clearly it's right
and proper we should follow those particular policies.
I think the issues and challenges come when the discussions
lead to a lower level than that about involvement in
programmes or particular schemes or particular initiatives
and I think that's where the potential conflict can
arise in relation to what is our role as distinct with
what is the Assembly's role.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Some micro-management, you suggest, is
going on, that they're getting involved in the details.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
That's a reasonable way in which to put
it.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
In paragraph 12, you make a slightly
Delphic remark about this, talking about making it more
challenging when seeking to influence policy. Could
you expand on that a little bit?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
I think, Chairman, obviously when you
have bodies such as the Arts Council for Wales and The
Sports Council for Wales, we prepare lottery strategies
and we've discussed our lottery strategy with Ministers.
Clearly, if there is disagreement, we resolve those
issues.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
That's with the Welsh Ministers?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
With the Welsh Ministers. To be perfectly
honest, there wasn't any fundamental disagreements in
terms of that policy development and we've continued
to discharge that lottery strategy. There are greater
challenges and this is more for Assembly Ministers to
answer rather than us in relation to how the Assembly
can influence UK bodies. It is certainly more challenging,
I think would be their view on matters, particularly
when those bodies clearly want to discharge a consistent
approach throughout the UK.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Do you sometimes go direct to the UK
bodies, or do you go through the Assembly Government
or with the Assembly Government?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
In terms of the relationship with the
National Lottery, we would go direct to UK bodies.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Which ones?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
The New Opportunities Fund and the Communities
Fund. The New Opportunities Fund and the Communities
Fund, it is proposed they'll amalgamate now. That will
probably be formally announced within the White Paper.
I don't think there is any secret about that. The idea
has been floated quite extensively. The combined body
will actually then distribute half of the lottery funds
throughout the whole of the United Kingdom. So, it will
become a very, very large body, which will make it even
more challenging in terms of relationships.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
You'll go direct to them to argue about
strategy; you wouldn't do it through the Assembly?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Only if we had practical problems, even
if we felt we weren't getting there.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
None of this is a question of the Assembly
having greater powers?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
No, the Assembly having greater powers
would be over how those UK bodies actually spend their
money in Wales.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
But you've said the forthcoming sports
strategy will be a test and will help to show whether
there is any need for any additional powers; that's
what I think you said earlier in paragraph 17 as well.
When is the strategy due to be published, so that we
know whether it will inform our work?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
We understand it will be any week now.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Could I pursue a little more this relationship
between yourself and we've taken evidence from
at least one other major quango about the problems of,
in a way, having the double accountability, one to a
Minister and Government and also to a Committee as well.
Would you welcome a kind of proper formal memorandum
of understanding establishing or attempting to define
the kind of relationship between a body like yourself
and the Assembly? There isn't one. They don't exist
at the moment. One senses you try to define the difference
between scrutiny and interference, basically. Would
you welcome that and, if so, any thoughts what that
memorandum should contain?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
One thing that would be useful
I'm not sure if Huw would agree is the remit
of the Committee as opposed to the Assembly Government.
That is one area which I think we are slightly confused
with.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
You're not alone.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
Some of the scrutiny tends to take place
at these Committee meetings we'd have, which, at the
end of the day, is fairly superficial because you're
allocated an hour, and make a quarter of an hour presentation
and have a few questions. The closer scrutiny in terms
of achievements, for example are we delivering
to our corporate plan, to our operational plan; what
is our record of achievement during that particular
year? which I think should be happening with
civil servants at the Assembly Government.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
It is or isn't happening, or should be
happening?
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
Should be happening, but, again from
my feedback, isn't happening there, whereas it seems
to me that it's the headline matters are discussed at
that level where it shouldn't be; it should be the real
nub of our business in terms of how are we functioning,
are we doing well, are we producing athletes, are we
making inroads into areas of deprivation, giving people
in Wales an equal chance? Those are the sort of discussions
I think the sponsor division should be dealing with
us, whereas perhaps the Culture Committee should
it's almost as if roles are reversed in terms of what
the Culture Committee should be doing.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Sounds like a skeleton idea of what a
memorandum could include.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
That would be a good idea, particularly
in terms of respective roles of the various bodies,
not just the Executive and Administration, but also
the Committee and ourselves in terms of who's going
to be doing what and how we fit in together.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
Can I go back to the issue of the National
Lottery, and I should publicly declare my interests
as a member of UK Sport at this point. I wonder if you
could say a little bit more, Huw and Gareth, about where
you feel the current arrangements hinder distinctive
policy development, developmental policy orientation
in terms of lottery spend in Wales? You hint at that
in paragraphs 12 to 14 and suggest, should there be
greater devolution of Wales over lottery money, there
would be a capacity to vary percentage spend and so
on according to need that relates to Wales. Can you
give us some concrete examples of where you might wish
to spend money differently if that was feasible and
possible?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
I think obviously the first thing to
say is the Assembly are very keen on having those powers
and they have formally adopted that position within
plenary sessions in the Assembly. Obviously if we had
additional powers, and if we had additional funds as
a result of those powers, then, clearly, as that would
be one of our statutory roles, we'd be discharging,
as distinct from our Royal Charter role, then we would
be subject to the powers of policy direction. I suspect
that those policy direction powers, if we could seek
to influence them, then we'd obviously want to influence
them in areas where we have low participation in sport.
Areas where we have low participation in sport are almost
invariably deprived areas, so if we could influence
the policy that's probably the greatest area where we
want to influence it.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
It's probably worth saying that the monies
that we receive from the National Lottery because
we're the one distribution body, plus we're grant aided
I think I marry them both up. We're not just
a grant aid organisation distributing monies for projects.
Those projects do tie into our strategy. I would argue
it is fairly effective and strategic distribution of
monies. It's not a case of a club or body coming to
us with a grandiose scheme of providing a hall or swimming
pool. We're mindful of the fact that we're spending
these grant aid monies, albeit lottery monies, in a
fairly strategic approach.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
There is no difference in this scenario
between yourselves and Scotland. Scottish distributors
have the same problems and they're all calling for the
same devolution of powers.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Absolutely.
|
|
Gareth Davies
|
|
When the lottery was introduced in 1994
all lottery monies were subject to capital spend. As
time has rolled on, I think we now have a 55/45 split
in favour of capital. 45% of monies are spent on revenue
schemes, which obviously take into account the political
agenda. It's not just buildings in places.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
You mentioned earlier co-operation between
schools' sports facilities I think that is what
you meant and local authorities' sports facilities.
Does the same issue arise at all with private educational
institutions? I mean, universities or public schools,
that kind of thing.
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
It certainly doesn't arise in terms of
public schools because we don't have significant numbers
of them in Wales - it isn't really a strategic problem.
We have certainly tried to involve independent schools
in our various schemes such as the Girls First Scheme
where we want to get more girls, in particular, involved
in sport and physical activity. In that instance, we
have involved independent schools. That's just small-scale
revenue funding. We wouldn't try to exclude them. The
Assembly was quite supportive of that principle. As
far as universities are concerned, that isn't a problem.
We work quite closely with universities and some of
our biggest schemes have been on university sites. For
example, the 50 metre pool that has been built in Swansea
and is now open, that was a partnership between the
university and the local authority with lottery funding
being the main mechanism by which it was supported,
but it was that partnership which has worked very well.
The same in Cardiff at the University of Wales Institute
Cardiff, in Cyncoed, with the National Indoor Athletic
Centre provided there. The same is true in North Wales
as well with the North East Wales Institute in Wrexham
where we've developed with them a significant regional
facility there and we agreed the other week to put a
regional artificial turf pitch in there, primarily for
hockey tournaments in North Wales. The relationship
with the higher education sector is a very close one.
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Is there provision for the use of these
facilities by the public? Is that built in too?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
Yes, it is. We'd ensure there is a service
level agreement of contractual obligations for a certain
period of time to ensure access.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
This Royal Charter business, does the
Secretary of State for Wales have anything to do with
that? Do you have any links with his office?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
No, it doesn't. The original powers in
the Royal Charter were vested with the Secretary of
State for Wales, but, on the establishment of the Assembly
this was prior to the Government of Wales Act
being introduced we changed those powers to the
National Assembly for Wales, so there is no link with
the Secretary of State any longer.
|
|
Vivienne Sugar
|
|
Could I ask about the concordat between
the Assembly and DCMS where you said you believe one
existed but you hadn't actually seen it? If we were
to ask our secretariat to get a copy, where should they
start?
|
|
Huw Jones
|
|
I think with the Culture, Sport and Welsh
Language Directorate of the Assembly; that would be
the best place.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I thank you very much indeed for
coming. You've exposed issues we hadnt previously
thought about. Now we have.
|
|
|