COMMISSION ON THE POWERS AND ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS
OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES
|
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
|
of the
|
EVIDENCE OF:
|
Wales Tourist Board
|
held at
|
The Civic Centre, Merthyr County Borough
Council
|
on
|
THURSDAY 26th JUNE 2003
|
In Attendance
|
|
|
|
Nigel Adams, Wales Tourist Board
|
|
Lord Richard, Richard Commission
|
|
Sir Michael Wheeler-Booth, Richard
Commission
|
|
Tom Jones, Richard Commission
|
|
Huw Thomas, Richard Commission
|
|
Ted Rowlands, Richard Commission
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister, Richard Commission
|
|
Paul Valerio, Richard Commission
|
|
Lord Richard, Richard Commission
|
|
Proceedings
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I thank you very much for coming.
I wonder if you'd do two things for us. First of all,
identify yourself for the purposes of the transcript
and then secondly if you'd be kind enough to open up
the topic perhaps for 5 or 10 minutes, then we'll pursue
whatever issues we think might be helpful to pursue,
if that's all right for you.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I'm Nigel Adams, Head of Policy at Wales
Tourist Board where I've worked for over 14 years. Prior
to that I worked in local government in England and
Wales. The first point I want to make is that tourism
is a very important industry to Wales, total visitor
spend by UK and overseas staying visitors generating
just under £2 billion in 2001 with a further 776 million
contributed by day visitors. We estimate that tourism
supports something in the region of 60,000 jobs directly
with a further 30,000 supported indirectly. A healthy
competitive tourism industry is vital to the Welsh economy.
|
|
The question perhaps you'd like answering,
I suppose, in one sense, is: has the Assembly made a
difference to the tourism sector? I feel undoubtedly
it has. As indicated in the paper I submitted, the Assembly
has enabled more resources to be put into supporting
the sector by both the successive Ministers for Economic
Development and the Economic Development Committee.
WTB's grant in aid has increased from 11.46 million
in 1998/1999, the last financial year before the establishment
of the Assembly, to 19.5 million in 2002/2003.
|
|
Prior to the Assembly's establishment,
WTB had very limited contact with Ministers, probably
only on the basis of an annual meeting a year with the
Chairman and Chief Executive. Now our Chairman and Chief
Executive have regular meetings with the Minister, probably
on a monthly basis. We also have regular meetings with
the Cross-Party Liaison Group on Tourism. The existence
of the Assembly has, I think, enabled Welsh solutions
to Welsh problems to be devised. The quotes in the paper
relate to Adfywio. I think the example also illustrates
the greater integration in working together between
Assembly sponsored public bodies and that there is a
increasingly joined-up government not an easy
task to achieve but, I think we are at long last
moving in the right direction. The creation by the Assembly
of a number of partnerships such as the Rural Partnership,
the Cymrun Creu (cultural partnership), Wales
Coastal Maritime Partnership, I think has helped build
a more integrated approach, a more working together
approach, although I think it's still early days for
these partnerships to really start achieving major things.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I ask you sorry to interrupt
to expand a bit on the Foot and Mouth Disease
because if anything looks a long way from the Welsh
Tourist Board it's the Foot and Mouth outbreak. You
say here it led to the Rural Recovery Plan and Adfywio
scheme. Can you expand on that?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
With Foot and Mouth, it illustrated just
how important tourism was for the rural economy. When
the footpaths were closed down, visitors stopped coming
because walking was a major part of the visitor experience
and it severely affected counties such as Powys and
Monmouthshire. The coastal areas around Wales were far
less affected, but certainly the countryside holiday
type of activity dropped dramatically. I think at the
time we were able to put in a recovery plan to try and
overcome these effects and I think tourism has made
a reasonable recovery from that. It's still got some
way to go, but we're on the way up again.
|
|
Sir Michael
Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Was any help given to the tourist industry
as a result? Farmers were given a lot of help, quite
naturally. I remember the Prime Minister was said to
have a holiday in Cumberland, or something.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
Certainly in Wales we operated a number
of schemes. We operated a grant scheme to help tourism
operators who lost marketing expenditure for that year,
that season, to help replace some of that lost expenditure.
We also operated a grant scheme under the Rural Recovery
Plan to assist in maintenance, up-grading properties,
recognising the loss of profits meant that operators
weren't able to carry out their normal basic maintenance
and minor improvements that you'd normally expect them
to do with profits from the season. So, there was a
grant scheme to assist with that. There was also additional
funds made available for the marketing of Wales as a
rural destination as well. There was help, but it was
certainly not of a scale of help that went to the farming
community.
|
|
Sir Michael
Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Did the National Assembly make those
funds available from their funds?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
Yes, via the National Assembly.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
In terms of day-to-day dealing of the
issue, were you confused by dealing with DEFRA or did
you have all the information you wanted from the National
Assembly as to the opening and closure of the paths
and what to give advice to would be visitors?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
The Assembly did set up from memory;
I wasn't directly involved a working group from
different agencies to work together for better co-ordination.
That would have fed information from DEFRA. For instance,
we were putting information out via our TICs and on
our web-site about what footpaths were open and that
was updated on a very regular basis. We also operated
the call line for people to phone up to find out about
what was open in a particular area.
|
|
Tom Jones
|
|
So, the Board was not confused about
where responsibility lay for giving permission to do
this or that? It got all the answers from the Assembly.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
In terms of our work, yes.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Sorry to have interrupted you.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
That's all right. I'd nearly come to
the end anyway. I think another positive benefit I've
seen happen over the last four years is that I think
Wales has taken a far more international outlook, building
relationships with other regional governments in Europe
and further afield. I think that will help us learn
from international experience and best practice and
it will enable us to be perhaps more outward-looking
in our thinking, perhaps ensuring that we're, at least
at times, ahead of the game. I think it probably will
be some time, however, before these positive benefits
I've outlined this afternoon and in the paper submitted
are actually felt by the man and woman in the street,
but the tourism sector is starting to feel a positive
impact; whether they attribute that positive impact
to the Assembly or not, I don't know.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Thank you very much. Can I ask you about
the paragraph in your second page: statutory registration
scheme for Wales? Can you spell that out a bit?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
Yes. It's been a longstanding desire
by the Tourist Board, or policy of the Tourist Board,
to promote the idea of statutory registration to ensure
there is a minimum standard for that, so that tourist
operators comply with the basic health and safety legislation.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
A registration scheme for tour operators?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
For accommodation operators. So, if you're
a B&B, guesthouse, or hotel you have to register.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
I see.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
We commissioned a report to look into
the pros and cons of different systems and looked at
what is being done elsewhere in Europe and also in Northern
Ireland because they have a statutory registration scheme
and the report came out with recommendations which we
went out to consultation on to the industry and, overall,
the balance of opinion was in favour of statutory registration,
so we submitted a recommendation to the Assembly, which
was accepted by the Assembly, but, because the Assembly
doesn't have powers for primary legislation, the legal
changes would have to be made by the UK Government
by Westminster.
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
Could you outline what those legal changes
were because I find it strange, in a sense, that you
started the task and must have talked with the Welsh
Assembly Government, or at least with some officials
beforehand, to know that at the end of the day you can't
actually implement it.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
There was a degree of uncertainty as
to whether it would need primary legislation at the
time because under the 1969 Development of Tourism Act
some people were of the opinion that the powers already
existed to introduce statutory legislation, but, when
it was tested out with the Civil Service, the Department
of Culture Media and Sport, it was decided that, no,
we'd have to go for new legislation.
|
|
Huw Thomas
|
|
So, you could introduce a voluntary scheme
but not a statutory scheme; is that it?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
In effect we've got a voluntary scheme,
people sign up to a grading scheme voluntarily, although
that is slightly different from statutory registration,
in a sense, but it's not a minimum scheme; it's a quality
assessment.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
The English department is not buying
this on principle or it just hasn't got parliamentary
time to do it? Does Whitehall think it's a good idea
or see it as bureaucracy or affecting business, whatever
it is? Is there an issue of principle between yourselves
and the National Assembly and Whitehall, or just a matter
of parliamentary time?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
It's primarily parliamentary time. There
is also perhaps more of a nervousness about it within
England than there is within Wales.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
In other words, they have some doubts
about the policy itself.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
Yes, I think their not 100% convinced,
but they're nearly convinced. Slight reservation.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
What about the structure that exists
that you talk about under "Relations between the Assembly
and Whitehall" (the last but one page)? You talk about
the role of VisitBritain in relation to the Wales Tourist
Board and English situation. In terms of statutory registration,
is what we have at the moment in Wales quite distinctive
in terms of the awarding of stars and crowns, whatever?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
The grading scheme is broadly compatible
with the Scottish scheme, but there are differences
with the English scheme. There was an attempt to get
harmonisation of grading schemes across the UK back,
I think, in the mid-nineties and it was proved impossible
because the motoring organisations who operate grading
schemes place greater emphasis perhaps on facilities
and size than both Scotland and Wales wanted to do;
we wanted to put great emphasis on quality. So, it proved
impossible to have a harmonious scheme. However, there
are further talks now taking place to try and look at
that again with a view to getting harmonisation.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
Is that one of the issues you're trying
to bring to our attention when you talk about VisitBritain
having a marketing role which includes Wales, obviously,
but then your role as Tourist Board is a combination
of marketing policy development, strategy for tourism,
and so on, or am I misreading that?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
The issue with VisitBritain is that basically
VisitBritain has a remit to market the whole of Britain
overseas. So, they market Wales alongside Scotland alongside
England. Whilst they have targets for getting overseas
visitors out of London, they do not have specific targets
for Wales or Scotland, and this has been the issue of
debate for a considerable length of time. We never satisfactorily
resolved it. I think there is a will to try and resolve
it. It is one of those untidy areas, I think, in tourism.
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
We only get 4% of overseas tourists which
is I don't say pathetic because that implies
criticism, which I'm not making, but it's a very small
percentage of what comes to the United Kingdom. If the
Assembly had primary legislation powers, how cost-effective
do you think it would be for Wales to actually market
Wales internationally?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
We did work alongside VisitBritain,
we now are to market Wales, particularly in what
we call our primary target markets: North America, Germany,
France, Netherlands. However, for us to operate the
type of operation that VisitBritain run, in duplicating
what they were doing, would not be particularly cost-effective
use of public money. I think we need to get agreement
on specific targets for VisitBritain to get more overseas
visitors into Wales and actually help build on what
they're doing, .
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
A very strange sort of relationship.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
It is.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Marketing you abroad and marketing England
in Wales.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
This is a problem that has actually arisen
out of a recent restructuring. Up until last year there
were two organisations: English Tourism Council, who
were responsible for marketing England within the UK,
and a separate organisation British Tourist Authority
responsible for marketing Britain overseas.
|
|
Paul Valerio
|
|
Which would that figure be, that 4%?
What should it reasonably be?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I think the figure, ideally, we'd be
talking 6 or 7% over time, but you remember you start
from a low base, so it's quite tough going. I mean,
London is the big magnet and most first time visitors
will go to London. To get them out of London is quite
a task. I think we can do it and we will be able to
eventually do it, particularly as Cardiff's profile
gets greater and we actually have a magnet to get them
into Wales. The other problem we have is, of course,
airports. Again, Cardiff has bmibaby now and we've got
more international routes coming into Cardiff, but it's
still quite limited. We have no direct links with the
United States. In terms of North Wales, it's probably
better served because it's by Manchester and Liverpool
airports.
|
|
Dr Laura McAllister
|
|
I was going to ask on the issue of transport
because visitors who come to the UK may well visit various
places, not necessarily one. Going back to our particular
task of looking at the powers of the Assembly, transport
is something that comes up regularly as being one area
where there are severe jagged edges in terms of scope
and control. I wonder what your feelings are on that
and what kind of liaison you've had with the Minister
who deals with the transport agenda because it strikes
me as being something vital for yourselves in the tourist
industry, not only into Wales but from north to south
and train links generally to move visitors around.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
We were involved when Sue Essex was Minister
for the Environment and set up a working party to look
at the future of Cardiff Wales Airport, and we were
represented on that working party, so we've had involvement
in terms of aviation. We've also met with senior civil
servants from the Assembly and civil servants from London
DTI who are producing the future of aviation consultation
paper and have had discussions with them. So, on aviation,
there has been a fair degree of involvement. On rail
I think it's more that we've made submissions to the
Strategic Rail Authority about our concerns about the
need to improve rail links between, say, Manchester
airports and North Wales, and also improving rail services
within Wales as well. There has been a meeting with
their staff as well, but perhaps we've not had quite
the same degree of involvement as we have on aviation.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Wales Tourist Board is a quango, and
one of the regional purposes of devolution was to produce
a far greater degree of proper scrutiny of quangos,
if not their abolition. You said you as the organisation
had regular contacts with Ministers and so forth. How
about the formal scrutiny of you as an organisation
by the appropriate National Assembly committee
perhaps there is more than one committee?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
The Economic Development Committee performs
this role..
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
You get scrutinised by them in a way
that someone would understand the scrutiny system?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
The first thing is that the Minister
each year provides us with a remit letter. Years ago,
remit letters were quite short, but now we're getting
longer and longer ones and more detail. That provides
a basis for scrutiny by the Minister and civil servants.
As a result, we've recently had a quinquennial review
of Wales Tourist Board by civil servants who are reporting
to the Economic Development Committee. That's a process
which all the Assembly's sponsored public bodies are
going through.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Remit letters are grown long. Quinquennial
review pre-dates...
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
Pre-dates and happened under the old
Welsh Office.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
I can remember it was before devolution,
so the remit letters are long. Are they public and are
they the subject of public discussion with the Assembly
committee, or is it a matter between yourselves and
the Minister?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I'd have to say I wouldn't be able to
answer that. I'm not aware of it being a public document.
It may be, but it's available to members of the Economic
Development Committee. ( It is a public document)
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
How often do you get scrutinised by the
Committee?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I think it would be no more than once
a year.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Regular contact with the Minister?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
On individual items we may make presentations
to the Economic Development Committee and other committees
such as the Rural Affairs Committee.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
You feel more scrutinised yourself, do
you?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
Yes, I think we are probably more scrutinised,
yes, because politicians are much closer to us; they
can scrutinise us better and they take more interest.
The fact that they do take more interest is a very good
thing.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Can I ask about this figure in this paper?
One of the largest industries contributing over 6 million
to the economy every day. Is that right?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
That was a figure we quoted in our Annual
Report. The figures I mentioned to you were it's just
under 2 billion a year in terms of staying visitors,
with a further 776 million in terms of day visitors.
Those are based on annual...
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
It is about 6.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
My maths isn't good enough to work it
out.
|
|
Sir Michael
Wheeler-Booth
|
|
Can I ask about comparisons with Scotland
because presumably they have a Scottish Tourist Board
and they're trying to up their number of visitors. Are
their increases in the figures comparable with Wales
and does the fact that the Scottish Parliament has bigger
powers than the National Assembly for Wales helped them?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I think VisitScotland has gone through
a bit of a difficult patch in the last couple of years
They went through a major restructuring exercise partly
as a result of the trade being upset with their past
performance. In terms of resources, yes, they probably
have got greater resources than Wales Tourist Board,
|
|
Sir Michael
Wheeler-Booth
|
|
I mean per person per head.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I couldn't give you a definitive answer
on that, but I could supply it in the next week if you
felt it would be helpful.
|
|
Sir Michael
Wheeler-Booth
|
|
What about the powers of the Parliament?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I'm not aware of the difference in the
powers of the Scottish Parliament making a direct impact
on the way that VisitScotland operates.
|
|
Ted Rowlands
|
|
Has the Scottish Parliament legislated
on home affairs at all since its inception?
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I'm not aware of it having done so.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
You don't want legislation, do you? There
is no legislative gap as far as you're concerned. The
structures all right.
|
|
Nigel Adams
|
|
I think the only area we were concerned
about was on statutory registration. That's the only
significant disadvantage we've come across so far.
|
|
Lord Richard
|
|
Thank you very much. I think you've made
your point very clearly and we're very grateful to you
for the paper and for coming to see us.
|
|
|