Llywodraeth Cynulliad Cymru Mynegai i'r Pynciau Y Comisiwn Richard
       
   
 
Llywodraeth Cynulliad Cymru Newyddion * Aelodau * Ymgynghoriad * Rhestr o Ddigwyddiadau * Rhestr o Dystiolaeth * Cwestiynau Cyffredin * Safleoedd Allanol * Cysylltwch â ni
*
 

THE POWERS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES:

fforwm Response to the Richard Commission's Consultation Document:

Issues and Questions for Consultation

INTRODUCTION

fforwm is the national organisation representing all 23 further education (FE) colleges and the 2 FE institutions in Wales. It is an educational charity and a company limited by guarantee. Its mission is to `raise the profile of colleges amongst key decision makers and support them in the continuous pursuit of high quality education and training aimed at stimulating the economic development, social well-being and cultural life in Wales'.
fforwm's Board comprises college principals and chairs of corporations, appointed by member colleges. fforwm provides a range of services to its members including networks, conferences on education and training, research, consultancy and the sharing of good practice. It also works closely with a wide range of partners in post-16 education and training. Through fforwm, colleges are represented on various committees, working parties and other groups influencing and shaping policy in post-16 education and life long learning.
As a key representative organisation within the education and training sector in Wales, fforwm places great emphasis on its lobbying role, -and increasingly upon its capacity as a policy development organisation.
fforwm welcomes the establishment of the Richard Commission and believes that now the Assembly has been in existence for a full term the time is right to review its powers.
In seeking continually and effectively to influence the Assembly's decision-making on education, economic, social and cultural matters, fforwm would like to offer the following observations regarding the powers of the National Assembly for Wales. Please note that this response covers only a few of the questions posed by the Richard Commission and does not cover the paper on the electoral arrangements.
OBSERVATIONS
In what practical ways do the powers of the Assembly, or the limits of its powers, impinge on you, your organisation or the people whom you serve and what are the best examples of this from your point of view?
The Assembly's decisions have a direct impact on the direction and actions of FE colleges in Wales. Decisions, for example, on the funding allocated to the National Council (NCYELWa and thence to post-16 educational and training institutions have a significant impact on the services provided by colleges and their close work with their communities. In addition, the annual remit letter of the Minister for Education and Lifelong, to the Chair of the NC-ELWa outlines the policy direction of NC-ELWa and should provide a clear framework within which colleges operate.
Another example of the powers of the Assembly impinging on colleges is the emphasis on widening participation and social inclusion in Wales, involving greater provision for those traditionally excluded from college education. The introduction of the Assembly Learning Grant (announced in February 2002), unique to Wales, is intended, for the first time, to provide guaranteed additional financial support for FE students. It particularly signalled the Assembly's recognition of the need to attract students from less privileged backgrounds to take up learning opportunities. As a result, individuals who may not otherwise have considered a course in FE are encouraged to take up education and training opportunities.
Negotiations over the pay of staff employed in FE colleges are a direct consequence of devolution. The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning announced in November 2002 separate pay arrangements for FE staff in Wales through an hypothecated sum of money allocated to colleges by the NC-ELWa. As a direct result, fforwm and trade unions in Wales have set up a Welsh National Negotiations Committee to consider pay of FE staff and make recommendations to college corporations.
How effective has the Assembly been in influencing UK Government policy making in relation to Wales - what are the practical examples which illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of the process."
Focusing on education policy, the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ), the change in the eligibility rules for Modem Apprenticeships, the framework for 14-19 learning in Wales and the introduction of a Credit and Curriculum Framework are some examples whereby policy developed within the Assembly have influenced or promise to influence education and training policy making at the UK Government level. The Department for Education and Skills Review of 14-19 Qualifications, chaired by Mike Tomlinson, has recently advocated a Baccalaureate type qualification, not dissimilar to the WBQ. And there is growing interest in England in introducing a credit based approach to curriculum development which will be more responsive to the needs of learners. One advantage of the relatively small size of Wales is that significant initiatives can be developed that may be of benefit to England and the other devolved administrations.
What are the advantages and disadvantages in principle of having a law making process which is shared between Cardiff and Westminster and what are the respective contribution of Aft, MPs and Peers?
In a lobbying capacity, fforwm and its member colleges find the Assembly is more accessible than Westminster. The smaller size of the Assembly and the commitment of AMs to issues impacting on Wades mean that matters can be progressed speedily. When working with MPs, fforwm is mindful of the fact that Welsh MPs comprise a small proportion of the total number of MPs in Westminster and that this small number may have to influence others who have perhaps little interest in Wales. The same applies to members of the House of Lords.
The statement by the Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning in The Leaming Country is significant. Commenting on the then Education Bill, the Minister stated that some parts of the Bill will be of specific interest to England. 'In so far as they are measures that that do not fit with arrangements that work well and get good results in Wales, we intend that the Assembly will have the power not to proceed with them.'
With regard to primary legislation passed by Westminster, clearly there is an important role for Welsh MPs to ensure that the impact of the proposed legislation on Wales is fully taken into account.
fforwm acknowledges that within the public of Wales there is some confusion over the respective roles of AMs and MPs and some concern over duplication of duties. Continued advice to the electorate of the advantages of the devolved Assembly by all political parties would be of benefit.
What would be gained or lost if there was a clearer separation between England and Wales in policy development and implementation?
Greater Wales specific policy development has helped bring decision-making closer to practitioners in the field of education and among other stakeholders. However, increased separation between England and Wales might lead to a decrease in the capacity to learn from the experiences of each other and to exchange best practice. For this reason alone, fforwm does not see the need for greater separation in policy development and implementation between Wales and England.
Furthermore, the existing arrangements have already produced Welsh policy initiatives, benefiting and meeting the needs of the local people of Wales. One major example is the development of   bilingualism in Wales, which probably would not have happened to the same degree without the support of the Welsh Assembly but still took place within the current arrangements. A clearer separation between England and Wales in policy development and implementation might be useful in helping the public in Wales understand more fully the powers of the Assembly compared with Westminster but this should not be confused with a greater separation.
fforwm is grateful for the opportunity to respond to this important consultation document. Should you wish to discuss any of the points made, please contact us on 029 20741800 or e-mail info(cafforwm.ac.uk.

dated 21 July 2003

 

Yn ôl i'r Brig