TREHERBERT BRANCH LABOUR PARTY
|
|
|
20 Glanselsig Street |
|
|
The Secretary 3rd June 2003 |
|
Dear Sir
Commission on the Powers and
|
|
| Members of the Treherbert Branch Labour Party (TBLP) wish to submit the following as evidence for consideration by the Commission. | |
| The Assembly's Powers | |
|
The powers granted to the Assembly by the Government of Wales Act should continue for a further significant period, and at least until the people of Wales are more persuaded of the Assembly's value and of the impact that the Assembly has on daily life in Wales. If, at some time in the future, through a process of evolution, there is an identified need for the Assembly to be given additional powers for it to operate more effectively in the interests of the people of Wales, this should be the subject of a further referendum of the people of Wales. |
|
|
The needs of Wales are not necessarily the same as the needs of Scotland, and additional powers on the Scottish model is seen by TBLP as simply an opportunistic stepping stone to full national status (or independence). There is also a fear that additional powers based on the Scottish model would lead to the abolition of the Wales Office. This would mean the loss of a dedicated Welsh voice at Cabinet. There would probably be a reduction in Welsh representation in the House of Commons, as is happening in Scotland. The Scottish model of law making powers may also not be appropriate for Wales because of differences between the judicial systems of Scotland and England and Wales. |
|
|
Tax varying powers should not be granted. These powers would inevitably mean that they would either not be used or they would be used to increase (never decrease) tax. The Electoral Arrangements TBLP feel very strongly that Proportional Representation in elections to the Assembly should be abolished. Huge numbers of electors have been completely unable to understand the list system. |
|
It has been difficult to explain
to voters:
|
|
|
The elections to the Assembly by a combination of FPTP (Constituency based) and Additional Member (regional closed party list) is only one element of wider confusion resulting from the different forms of voting systems that exist and are proposed, and other changes that have been introduced in recent years:
|
|
|
It is acknowledged that all electoral systems have their own benefits and foibles, and whilst FPTP of course has its own weaknesses and critics, TBLP believe that it is the 'least worst' option by far. As indicated above, they believe that the PR system for the Assembly elections should be abolished. The following comments are made, however, in order to influence any outcome that may regrettably retain a PR element:
|
|
| Size
TBLP does not want to see an increase in the number of AMs; indeed, they would accept a reduction to 40 if that were the price to achieve the abolition of PR. |
|
| Conclusion
The people understand FPTP. We detect no support for PR amongst voters in our area. As voters in the Assembly elections are not a separate group of people from those who vote in other elections, TBLP urge the Commission to consider the NAfW electoral system in the context of electoral systems across the UK, and in the context of the UK in Europe, and not in the context of the National Assembly for Wales in isolation. |
|
| Yours sincerely | |
| Margaret Phillips (Secretary) | |
|
|
|