TREHERBERT BRANCH LABOUR PARTY
Secretary: Margaret Phillips
|
|
20 Glanselsig Street
Blaencwm
TREORCHY
Rhondda
CF42 5EB
|
|
The Secretary
Richard Commission
Caradog House
1-6 Saint Andrews Place
CARDIFF
CF10 3BE
3rd June 2003
|
|
Dear Sir
Commission on the Powers and
Electoral Arrangements of the National Assembly for
Wales
|
| Members of the Treherbert Branch
Labour Party (TBLP) wish to submit the following as evidence
for consideration by the Commission. |
| The Assembly's Powers |
|
The powers granted to the Assembly by
the Government of Wales Act should continue for a further
significant period, and at least until the people of
Wales are more persuaded of the Assembly's value and
of the impact that the Assembly has on daily life in
Wales.
If, at some time in the future, through
a process of evolution, there is an identified need
for the Assembly to be given additional powers for it
to operate more effectively in the interests of the
people of Wales, this should be the subject of a further
referendum of the people of Wales.
|
|
The needs of Wales are not necessarily
the same as the needs of Scotland, and additional
powers on the Scottish model is seen by TBLP
as simply an opportunistic stepping stone to full national
status (or independence).
There is also a fear that additional
powers based on the Scottish model would lead to the
abolition of the Wales Office. This would mean the loss
of a dedicated Welsh voice at Cabinet. There would probably
be a reduction in Welsh representation in the House
of Commons, as is happening in Scotland.
The Scottish model of law making powers
may also not be appropriate for Wales because of differences
between the judicial systems of Scotland and England
and Wales.
|
|
Tax varying powers should not be granted.
These powers would inevitably mean that they would either
not be used or they would be used to increase (never
decrease) tax.
The Electoral Arrangements
TBLP feel very strongly that Proportional
Representation in elections to the Assembly should be
abolished.
Huge numbers of electors have been completely
unable to understand the list system.
|
It has been difficult to explain
to voters:
- How someone who has been defeated in a First Past
the Post constituency seat (sometimes by significant
margins) can still be elected. Indeed, no less
than 19 of the 20 AMs elected on the list in 2003
were defeated in the FPTP constituency elections.
The 20th list AM had been defeated in the Rhondda
in the General Election.
- The 'closed' aspect of the list. Voters feel indignant
that they have not had a choice between specified
candidates, either within Party lists or between Parties.
- How the Rhondda had no Labour representative amongst
list AMs in the Assembly from 1999-2003, despite polling
37% of the list vote in South Wales Central in 1999.
- How Labour could achieve 310,658 list votes across
Wales in 2003 and there are no Labour list AMs.
- How the Party with the least support can weald the
greatest power, as led to the Coalition Government
from 2000-2003.
|
|
The elections to the Assembly by a combination
of FPTP (Constituency based) and Additional Member (regional
closed party list) is only one element of wider
confusion resulting from the different forms of voting
systems that exist and are proposed, and other changes
that have been introduced in recent years:
- Elections to the European Parliament are held by
means of an all-Wales closed Party list
system.
- Unitary Authorities have replaced the previous two-tier
system of local government, though this is something
that TBLP supported as a move to reduce confusion.
- Members of Treherbert BLP note from the influential
`Campaign for a Democratic Upper House' that elections
for a reformed House of Lords in the future are likely
to be on the basis of an all-Wales open list
system. This would introduce further confusion.
- Elections to the House of Commons is by FPTP and
TBLP note that there are no proposals for change here.
|
|
It is acknowledged that all electoral
systems have their own benefits and foibles, and whilst
FPTP of course has its own weaknesses and critics, TBLP
believe that it is the 'least worst' option by far.
As indicated above, they believe
that the PR system for the Assembly elections
should be abolished. The following comments are made,
however, in order to influence any outcome that may
regrettably retain a PR element:
- The ability for one individual to stand in a FPTP
constituency seat and to be nominated as a
Party list candidate should be scrapped.
- Any PR system for additional members should reflect
the votes cast in the election for the additional
members and should therefore be distinct from and
take no account of the elections of the FPTP members.
- Parties should be compelled to make it clear how
they select their nominees to any system that may
survive.
|
| Size
TBLP does not want to see an increase
in the number of AMs; indeed, they would accept a reduction
to 40 if that were the price to achieve the abolition
of PR.
|
| Conclusion
The people understand FPTP. We
detect no support for PR amongst voters in our area.
As voters in the Assembly elections are
not a separate group of people from those who vote in
other elections, TBLP urge the Commission to consider
the NAfW electoral system in the context of electoral
systems across the UK, and in the context of the UK
in Europe, and not in the context of the National
Assembly for Wales in isolation.
|
| Yours sincerely |
.jpg) |
| Margaret Phillips (Secretary) |
|
|